

⚡ Track fat, not just weight—because your progress deserves precision.
The Omron HBF-306C is a handheld body fat loss monitor that uses clinically proven bioelectrical impedance technology to deliver fast, accurate body fat percentage and BMI readings. Featuring dual modes for standard users and athletes, it stores up to 9 profiles, displays results in 7 seconds, and supports both US and Metric units—making it an essential, easy-to-use tool for anyone serious about tracking their body composition and optimizing their health journey.
| ASIN | B000FYZMYK |
| ASIN | B000FYZMYK |
| Batteries | 2 AAA batteries required. (included) |
| Battery Description | battery_type_aaa |
| Best Sellers Rank | #117,837 in Health & Household ( See Top 100 in Health & Household ) #22 in Body Fat Monitors #4,328 in Sales & Deals |
| Brand Name | Omron |
| Color | Black |
| Customer Reviews | 4.3 4.3 out of 5 stars (4,383) |
| Date First Available | June 1, 2006 |
| Department | Health Monitors |
| Is Discontinued By Manufacturer | No |
| Item Weight | 0.8 Pounds |
| Item model number | HBF-306CN |
| Manufacturer | Omron Healthcare, Inc. |
| Manufacturer | Omron Healthcare, Inc. |
| Manufacturer Part Number | HBF306CN |
| Material Type | Metal, Plastic |
| Model Number | HBF-306CN |
| Product Dimensions | 8.75 x 2.5 x 6 inches; 12.8 ounces |
| Size | 1 Count (Pack of 1) |
| UPC | 073796306304 |
| Unit Count | 1 Count |
| Warranty Description | 1 YEAR |
J**M
Good monitor, has lasted 11 years so far..
I've had the same one since 2015, and it seems accurate. I can totally see the accuracy through the ups and downs of my body composition through the years. The main reason I'm writing this review is because I bought it back then for $28!! Crazy, let's see if it gets to $1000 by 2035, sheesh.
J**M
Great Product
want a reason to stay on the healthy diet. If you give up before monitoring your body fat and measuring inches, you are looking for the easy way out. This is the easiest way to monitor body fat, just a few clicks and it gives a great reading. I started a lifestyle change around xmas time and like usual followed with a new years resolution to make a lifestyle change. As a PE teacher and former college athlete i was not setting a great example to my students and players. While in college I had done body comp tests to better understand the practice and each method. Like most reviews will say there are pros and cons to each but I actually witnessed a study against the gold standard, under water weighing, the omron did very well. If i remember right most amateurs with the calipers where not doing so hot. This seemed to me,factoring in the ease of use and speed of response that this is the best way to go. Personally my girlfriend and I use it at least once a week to monitor fat loss. We use it at the same time every morning every week, take two readings and use it for feedback on our diet progress. Women especially dont always lose lbs on the diet we have implemented so I wanted extra proof and motivation to keep at it as a family. As a teacher I will be using it as a tool in physical education to explain healthy body weight and body comp. I know that many factors can skew the numbers here but you dont have to be a rocket scientist or even know what a variable is to use common sense and test the same way every time. If you control your hydration variable alone you should be fine. for 30 bucks get this product, use it the right way and you will be able to track your progress and tweak your diet and fitness routine to see the results you want
C**E
Very Precise, User Error Probably Leads to Imprecision
After reading over several reviews of this product, mostly VERY high praise, I placed my order. I then went back and read all the one star reviews, to see what the gripes people had with the product were. They seem to mainly be that the product is not precise, that is, taking one reading after another yields a wide range of results. I got concerned that I made a bad choice, but the purchase was already complete. My item arrived today (VERY fast with the free super-saver shipping, I must say) and I've gotten a chance to test it for myself. I found that it is VERY precise. MUCH more than expected actually. Precision means repeated tests yield results very close together, while accurate means the results are close to the actual value. I cannot speak on its accuracy, since I do not have a known accurate method of testing my fat % to compare it to. But most of the reviews complain of imprecision, but I can say from my testing is not an issue. I did ten repeated readings using the correct positioning (standing up, arms straight out 90 degrees from body). The readings were ALL within 0.2% of each other. From my experience with statistics, I can say with 95% confidence that my body fat reading is 17.30% plus or minus 0.14%. I then started toying around with all the wrong positions. I did sitting, with arms in the correct position, and got an average of 17.58%. Looks like sitting skews the reading upwards just slightly. But the range of values was still quite small, and I can be 95% certain that the value is 17.58% plus or minus 0.17%, only a tiny increase in uncertainty. That result was pretty close to the correct position result, surprisingly. Now, all the very inaccurate positions: -Sitting, arms bent at 90 degrees: 14.98 +/- 0.41% -Standing, arms bent at 90 degrees: 15.66 +/- 0.27% -Standing, arms bent and out slightly forward, so screen is easily visible by glancing down (likely a commonly used incorrect position since it's the position that allows you to be most comfortable while most easily viewing the readout): 15.96 +/- 0.23% So, as long as your position remains the same over multiple readings, even incorrect positions yield quite consistent results. I can only imagine that if repeated readings yield vastly different results, it's due to a variety of positions used during the readings. OR a faulty device. Or maybe there's something funky about your body that the device just doesn't like - a few reviewers commented that it just plain doesn't work with some people, so maybe with others it works but is inconsistent. In any case, unless you are working towards a very specific body fat % goal, you're probably using this to help observe your fat loss better (rather than just using your weight, which could drop slower than expected due to increases in muscle mass from working out more), which means you're more interested in relative values anyway. So regardless of whether it's accurately reading your body fat %, you'll get use out of it by seeing how the values change in relation to what they were before. And as long as it's precise, you're good to go. So follow the directions in the manual about body position, about when to measure in relation to meals and working out, and you can feel good buying this product, because it's a great deal and gives you much better insight into your weight loss than the number on a scale.
C**I
I'm a personal trainer so I have skin fold callipers to use also, but I find this product really useful and would recommend it. I wanted something that is portable. If you read the instructions properly you shouldn't have a problem.
D**A
Useless product - gives different / erratic readings every time (despite following all the usage instructions correctly) - thus unreliable for the purpose it was purchased.
A**A
Excelente para medir el porcentaje de grasa, al principio cuesta un poco configurarlo, pero de ahí todo bien. Este es más para uso doméstico.
C**S
Works great, no complaints
J**O
Es buen producto lo malo solo es medidas de EU
Trustpilot
Hace 3 semanas
Hace 1 mes