Intel NUC5CPYH Next Unit of Mini PC Computing Kit (Inel Pentium N3700 1.6 GHz Processor, 8 GB HDD, HD Graphics)

These boxes are absolutely rock solid. They are easy to setup and run perfectly. I have tried them with Ubuntu Linux 16.04 and Windows 10 and they are totally reliable. You get a good feel about the quality as soon as you open the box. When you switch it on the BIOS setup has a Windows style GUI, again giving you a quality feel. Operating system installation with Windows and Linux is totally smooth with no issues - just click, click next. In stark contrast if you are considering Gigabyte Brix as an alternative - don't. I have recently bought two Gigabyte Brix devices and they are unreliable having frequent operating system crashes, both with Window 10 and Linux (not actually supported by Brix). I feel quite burned by this as I spent many hours trying to resolve the problems. Not so with the Intel NUC.

I came across NUCs at work, and I thought I'd try one. One of the best IT decisions I ever made... I was struggling with running a Wordpress server on a virtual machine running Ubuntu. I got the NUC plus 8GB RAM and a small SSD for about 200 quid, plugged int my LAN and Bob's yer uncle :-) To be a bit more serious... The hardware is very solid feeling, even though the one I bought was the low end item. Kit contains the NUC itself and a power supply, with minimal documentation, in a very robust package. The required SSD and RAM was very easy to install and went in with no problems. Plugging in and powering up was straightforward, and getting into the BIOS to check and set the boot order was simple. I installed Ubuntu LTS16.04 from a bootable USB, followed by MySQL and WordPress and finally Eclipse for coding purposes (gotta love open source and free software). Connected to my LAN and it has been running as a headless Wordpress server and development platform ever since. Highly recommended as a cheap solution to either desktop or server kit, particularly if you are OK with using a flavour of Linux as the OS.

Working well so far - 4* as can't judge reliability fully yet. Just be aware all the external usb ports are USB3.0 - if you're installing an OS from scratch that doesn't have USB3 support (eg Windows 7) then the ports don't work when you get into the OS installer! You can manually add the USB3 drivers to the install image but this is a bit of a pain or you can get an adapter to give you access to the internal USB2 ports (note, not a standard fit - small pitch).

I bought this to replace my elderly Mother's old PC which was taking up too much space and beginning to show signs of age. All it will be used for is email, web browsing, and Office programmes. I fitted a 500GB SSD and 8GB of DDR3 RAM, and the whole package cost less than £220 including a Windows 10 Pro OEM license. It took me 5 minutes to assemble, another hour to install the OS, and it works brilliantly. Virtually silent, takes up no space, and looks really neat. My mother is delighted.

This is an excellent piece of kit that fulfilled my expectations exactly. High speed, very low noise, and super easy set up for Linux. The include bracket to mount the unit behind the screen is particularly welcome. I received the NUC and 4GB memory chip in a single delivery 1 day before expected and installed the memory, a 500GB SATA Disk Linux Mint 18.1 and135Gb of programs, music and video in less than 3 hours.

I am a long-term Mac user but I wanted a cheap Intel NUC to experiment with Arch Linux. I am really surprised at how capable this little computer is. I fitted a 4GB RAM chip and a 128GB SSD. I'm not into gaming (other than learning to create 2D games in Python), so this is really a home workstation. It has only an Intel Celeron but I don't notice much of a drop in speed compared with my Mac mini i7. The HDMI graphics/audio work well with my BENQ 24" monitor. With external speakers running from the monitor the stereo sound is good (classical music mainly). Obviously the demand on the SSD Storage is light because Arch Linux is a super-efficient operating system. I have all the standard types of applications for a home desktop using open source software. I'm no fan of Microsoft so there is none of that on my computer. Overall, I'm delighted with the Intel NUC and I may well buy a more powerful model once the Coffee Lake NUCs are well-established. BTW, Arch Linux is a very straightforward installation on this NUC and is very stable. I updated the BIOS and that is also very easy.

The Product Information - Technical Details state the system comes with 8GB RAM and the Maximum Supported is 8GB RAM (see attached screenshot). However from the communication with Ebuyer they say RAM size is also the Maximum Supported size which does not make any sense, why would it be twice specified with different names. The included memory was the reason I bought it, if it said RAM size 0GB and Maximum 8GB I wouldn't have had a problem, but I purchased it because I have the Hard drive and needed a system with memory; or I could have oriented for a cheaper one and bought the RAM separately, which in fact I ended up doing as Ebuyer wouldn't agree to send the 8GB (I also was willing to have sent only 4GB as the system was to be ready at a certain date, but they also refused that).

I struggled for ages trying to make an outwardly similar box (a Gigabyte Brix) work with Linux. Constant freezes and lock ups. This box was a breeze to set up, Linux Mint 18 installed on it without any bother.

Por ahora todo va de lujo. Me costó un poco dar con la distro que mejor se ajustara para un pequeño servidor linux. Funciona a la perfección como mediacenter dlna, centro de descargas y como pequeño servidor de desarrollo. Lo he configurado como un single node cluster de kubernetes/docker con rancher a ver cómo lo llevaba y he de decir que me ha sorprendido gratamente. Todo ha funcionado sin problemas a la primera y sólo está consumiendo alrededor de 1gb de ram y 0,5 cores con el dlna y el torrent en docker. Con el módulo de 8GB de RAM, aún le sobran 7GB y 1,5 cores ;) Por tanto, un 10 como mediacenter y otro 10 como centro de trasteo 24/7

たぶんWindows系だと世代的な問題も出てくると思いますが、AlmaLinux9.3で問題なく動作します。 BIOS設定画面が無駄に高解像度なせいで、小さなモニター繋いで表示されなくて焦りました。 取説の類いが何もありませんが、部品の欠品やコネクタ破損などはなく、まだまだ現役で使います。 同じものを過去に使ったことがあれば普通に使えます。

Esta mini pc tiene un tamaño y peso muy bueno y viene con soporte para la pared incluido y funciona de manera my fluida solo debo especificar que el modelo que yo compre venia sin RAM ni disco duro, el empaque excelente y su funcionamiento muy bueno yo al uso como emulador retro y centro multimedia y funciona de maravilla muy recomendable.

Good for day to day tasks and have a capable hardware. Coupled with good quality RAM and a SSD, it can perform well for browsing, video playback and office. A lot smaller than expected. Looks good and every thing works out of box with ubuntu 16.04. no driver issues. For windows, drivers are easily available in Intel site. Just don't expect gaming and i5 class performance . We get what we are paying for.

I bought this to act as a headless Network Attached Storage (NAS) and gitolite server, controlling two 4TB hard drives in an Orico USB3 external drive enclosure (BTRFS RAID-1 configuration). It arrived six days ago. The CPU, anemic by today's beefy standards, is more than sufficient for that purpose. I purchased the Crucial 4GB memory module ( CT51264BF160B ) and a Kingston 120GB SSD ( SV300S37A/120G ) to go along with it. The memory is not on the Intel-certified list for this device, though the same memory in a different internal configuration is (the CT51264BF160BJ, with the "J" at the end), but it works fine. The SSD is major overkill for my needs, but it's fast and inexpensive; if I'd realized that the machine could run on an SD card, I might have skipped an internal hard drive entirely, though it would only have saved a few dollars. Both of them slotted in with no problem. It had a VGA monitor, USB keyboard, and USB mouse plugged into it for the setup. It also had a wired network connection, though it includes a wireless network card that had no problem with either my 2.4GHz or 5GHz networks. The BIOS was four revisions behind Intel's latest, but updating it (via SD card, from the menu that appeared when booting) was very easy. The only change I made to the BIOS settings initially was to set the OS to Linux. Installing Ubuntu GNOME 16.10, from an SD card formatted by another Ubuntu installation's Startup Disk Creator, was simplicity itself. Other than the questions the installer asked to set up the initial account and other settings, it was all automatic, and everything just worked (but read on). I did have two problems with it. The first was an internal overheating problem when I was transferring about a terabyte of information from a portable USB3 hard drive (plugged into the front of the machine) to the drives in the USB3 drive enclosure (plugged into the back). Moving the drive enclosure's USB plug to the front of the machine (which a comment elsewhere suggested might be less sensitive to thermal problems) and changing the BIOS fan setting to "cool" solved those; likely the BIOS setting alone would have fixed it, but I haven't confirmed that yet. I still can't hear the fan in it, even listening very closely, but your mileage may vary. The second problem was that after the drives in the Orico enclosure had been unused for a little while, the machine seemed to lose track of them. It wouldn't reconnect until I powered the Orico enclosure off and on again, or unplugged it and plugged it back in. It turned out to happen when the machine put the USB ports into power-saving mode, and was pretty easy to fix by having the machine run these commands when the system booted: echo 'on' > '/sys/bus/usb/devices/usb1/power/control'; echo 'on' > '/sys/bus/usb/devices/usb2/power/control'; (They're run via a script started by an @reboot cron job, run as the root user.) I don't know if that is a bug in the Orico enclosure's USB firmware or the NUC's, but I didn't have that problem with the three portable USB drives (two USB3, one USB2, all from different manufacturers) I've tried on it. Now that those problems are fixed, I'm very happy with the unit. With enough shopping around, I *might* have been able to build a similarly-spec'd small tower machine at a comparable price, but poking around on various parts websites, it wouldn't have been easy, and certainly wouldn't have been as low on electricity usage. As I already had the Orico drive enclosure (the dead machine that the NUC replaced was a micro-tower, and too small to hold them too), the lack of internal space for the 4TB drives was no hardship. The problems I had with it aren't likely to hit many people, so I'd recommend this machine to anyone technical enough to install the memory, hard drive, and OS.