Reef Safe Sunscreen SPF 45 – Biodegradable Mineral Zinc Oxide Lotion, Water Resistant, Travel Size 2.5 oz, Face & Body

Huge fan of this sunscreen. My daughter has sensitive skin and it doesn’t break her out.

Works good in the sun and makes your face look really clean

Works well

I got this sunscreen because I was going on a couple of snokeling excursions, so I wanted to be sure I had reef safe sunscreen. I made sure to read others' reviews of the product first to see how to properly apply it. I was happy I did, because the sunscreen does apply a bit differently than your traditional ones. It goes on thick and has to really be rubbed in. I'm white skinned, and I felt it rubbed in really well. It rubbed in pretty well on my medium-skinned husband as well. I really liked that it had the shimmers in it, because I could tell where I applied the cream. I found it to not be as heavy or greasy feeling as other sunscreens. It did a pretty good job as well, as I didn't get burned. I only tested it in the ocean, so I don't know if it is equally effective in fresh water or chlorinated pools, but I was really happy with this. It's a bit smaller and more expensive than traditionaI sunscreens, but a little goes a long way. I will definitely continue to use this, especially with water activities in the ocean.

When I booked a trip to St Croix, Virgin Islands, I quickly learned it was required to wear Reef Safe sunscreen when swimming around the coral reef. After a quick search, I happened upon this sunscreen and felt good about the ingredients that were going on my body and knowing I was protecting marine life. The product itself is not sticky or greasy and doesn't wash off in the water. It goes on white but after thoroughly rubbing it in, it's barely noticeable. After spending 3 hours in direct sun on a boat and swimming in the ocean, I was NOT sunburned. That says a lot for someone with very fair skin. Things to note, a little bit goes a long way and it's thick. I put little dots allover my body and then rub it all in connecting the dots. Now our entire family, including 3 kids, use this product without any skin reactions or sunburns. It's a mistake buy!!

Worked for us when out on a Florida trip in the gulf of America

There is no expiration date on the product? Color tint is good. Thick cream due to zinc.

My original review is below where I noticed the bottle said Titanium Dioxide vs Zinc Oxide. I had title my review that I received the wrong product. I reached out to the company on Instagram and they responded: "We recently discovered that a small batch of our Happy Ocean SPF 45 Zinc-based Mineral Sunscreen was printed with an incorrect Drug Facts panel on the back label. The formula inside is absolutely our correct zinc-based sunscreen with WetBoost™ technology — just as shown in the Amazon listing and images — but the label was mistakenly designed using the Drug Facts from our SPF 30 Sport, which contains titanium dioxide. This was a label design error (not a packaging error), and unfortunately it slipped through during a rush to keep up with demand. As soon as we became aware, we halted that batch and corrected the design for all future runs." The offered a refund but it was not necessary as I used the product. Now I know why it spread like Zinc Oxide, because it was! I appreciate their response and wanted to update my review accordingly. It is a great product! On the plus side, it works incredibly well and is very water resistant. Now the negative, I bought this very expensive sunscreen 100% because it is a "non-nano Zinc oxide" sunscreen. I never thought to check but in reading another review, the poster said they received Titanium Dioxide - sure enough I check my bottle and I received the same thing! What the heck - this is FALSE ADVERTISING as the picture in the listing shows the back of the bottle clearly labeled as "Zinc Oxide 19% (non-nano)". I can buy this size of Titanium Dioxide sunscreen for half this price. I want my money back! What is odd is that it spreads just like a zinc oxide sunscreen, so I'm questioning if it was mis-labeled or what????